Cohesion Performance and Sustainable Development Progress in EU States

Roxana Maria Bâdîrcea, Cristian Dragan, Anca Tanasie, Gheorghe Axinte, Mihai-Ionut Radoi, Maria Enescu

Resumen


El progreso constante en términos de desarrollo sostenible y el logro de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) bajo la Agenda 2030 son preocupaciones de primera magnitud para todos los actores involucrados. A través de esta investigación, llevamos a cabo una investigación sobre el desempeño de los 28 estados miembros de la UE en términos de logros relacionados con el desarrollo sostenible, así como los factores que respaldan estos esfuerzos, a partir de los datos proporcionados por el Índice SDG y Dashboards y Eurostat. Los resultados destacan la importancia de las inversiones en I + D como principal impulsor del avance en el logro de los ODS. Al mismo tiempo, los resultados de la investigación pueden brindar apoyo a los responsables políticos y a las empresas para contribuir a una asignación más eficiente de los recursos disponibles y maximizar el impacto de los factores relevantes para garantizar la prosperidad y la seguridad de las personas y la sociedad.


Palabras clave


desarrollo sostenible; cohesión de la UE; Agenda 2030; Índice SDG; Inversiones en I + D.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)           Cómo citar un elemento

Referencias


Al-Roubaie, A. (2013). Building Knowledge Capacity for Sustainable Development in The Arab World. IJIKMMENA, 2(1), 7-20.

Avram, C., Radu, R., Pirvu, G., and Gruescu, R., (2007). Romania and The Requirements of European Integration (pp. 200-218), Craiova: Alma.

Barca, F. (2009). An Agenda for A Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Independent report prepared at the request of the European Commissioner for Regional Policy, Retrieved 10 April 2019. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/policy/future/barca_en.htm.

Becker, S.O., Egger, P.H. and von Ehrlich, M. (2013). Absorptive Capacity and the Growth and Investment Effects of Regional Transfers: A Regression Discontinuity Design with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(4), 29-77.

Bramley, G. and Power, S. (2009). Urban Form and Social Sustainability: The Role of Density and Housing Type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(1), 30-48.

Böhme K., Doucet P., Komornicki T., Zaucha J., and ?wi?tek D. (2011). How to Strengthen the Territorial Dimension of ‘Europe 2020’ and EU Cohesion Policy, Warsaw.

Bruhn, J. (2009). The Group Effect: Social Cohesion and Health Outcomes. Springer-Verlag US, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0364-8.

Counsell, D. and Haughton, G. (2004). Regions, Spatial Strategies and Sustainable Development. 1st Edition, Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561249.

Dall'erba, S. and Fang, F. (2015). Meta-Analysis of the Impact of European Union Structural Funds on Regional Growth. Regional Studies, 51, 1-12.

European Commission, (2008). Turning Territorial Diversity into Strenght, Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion. Retrieved 10 April 2019 from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0616:FIN:EN.

European Commission, (2017). My region, My Europe, Our future: The 7th report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Retrieved 20 April 2019 from: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/cohesion7/7cr.pdf

European Commission, (2018). Regional Development and Cohesion Policy 2021-2027. Retrieved 15 April 2019 from:

https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/newsroom/news/2018/06/06-08-2018-regional-development-and-cohesion-policy-2021-2027.

European Commission (2018a). Regional Development and Cohesion Policy beyond 2020: The New Framework at a glance. Retrieved 27 April 2019 from: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/2021_2027/.

European Council on Foreign Relations, (2019). EU Cohesion Monitor. Retrieved 21 April 2019 from:

https://www.ecfr.eu/page/ECFR281_EU_COHESION_MONITOR_2019.pdf

Eurostat, (2018). Sustainable development in the European Union — Monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an EU context. Retrieved 21 April 2019 from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-statistical- books /-/ KS-01-18-656 eucohesionmonitor.

Ferrara, A., McCann, P., Pellegrini, G., Stelder, D. and Terribile, F. (2017). Assessing the Impacts of Cohesion Policy on EU Regions: A Non-Parametric Analysis on Interventions Promoting Research and Innovation and Transport Accessibility. Papers in Regional Science, 96(4), 817-841.

Fonseca, X., Lukosch, S. and Braz?ier. F. (2019). Social Cohesion Revisited: A New Definition and How to Characterize it. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(2), 231-253.

Forrest, R. and Kearns, A. (2001). Social Cohesion, Social Capital, and the Neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143.

Fratesi, U. and Wishlade, F.G. (2017). The Impact of European Cohesion Policy in Different Contexts. Regional Studies, 51(6), 817-821.

Friedkin, N.E. (2004). Social Cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 409–425.

Hametner, M., Martinuzzi, A., Sedlacko, M., Gjoksi, N. and Endl, A. (2010). Research & Development for Sustainable Development: How European R&D Activities and Programmes Contribute to SD. ESDN Quarterly Report, 1-49.

Hirschi, C. (2010). Strengthening Regional Cohesion: Collaborative Networks and Sustainable Development in Swiss Rural Areas. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 16.

Holgado Molina, M.M., Salinas Fernández, J.A. and Rodriguez Martín, J.A., (2015). A Synthetic Indicator to Measure the Economic and Social Cohesion of the Regions of Spain and Portugal. Revista de Economia Mundial, 223-239.

Klinenberg, E. (2001). Dying Alone: The Social Production of Urban Isolation. Ethnography, 2(4), 501-531.

Kostrzewa, K. and Piasecki, R. (2009). Approaches to Sustainable Development in Poland, L'Europe en Formation, 352(2), 181-196.

Labar, A.V. (2008): SPSS for Educational Sciences (pp. 257-286), Iasi: Polirom.

Manta, A.G. and Badircea R. (2014): Measuring the Efficiency in the Romanian Banking System Through the Method of the Data Envelopment Analysis. Annals of University of Craiova – Economic Sciences Series, 1(42), 23-34.

Medeiros, E. (2017): From Smart Growth to European Spatial Planning: A New Paradigm for EU Cohesion Policy Post-2020. European Planning Studies, 25(10), 1856-1875.

Mykhnenko, V. and Wolff, M. (2019): State Rescaling and Economic Convergence. Regional Studies, 53(4), 462-477.

Nayyar, D. (2012): Macroeconomics and Human Development. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(1), 7-30.

Ohlson, J.A. (1995): Earnings, Book Value, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11 (2), 661?687.

Painter, J. (2006): Prosaic geographies of stateness. Political Geography, 25(7), 752-774.

Pellegrini, G., Terribile, F., Tarola, O., Muccigrosso, T. and Busillo, F. (2013): Measuring the Effects of European Regional Policy on Economic Growth: Regression Discontinuity Approach, Papers in Regional Science, 92(1), 217-233.

Pillet, F., Cañizares, M.C., Ruiz, A.R., Martínez, H., Plaza, J. and Santos, J.F. (2014): Applying the European Spatial Development Perspective in Low-density Regions: A Methodology Based on Mobility and Labour Market Structure, Urban Studies, 51(3), 577–595.

Pîrvu R., B?dîrcea R., Manta A. and Lup?ncescu M., (2018): The Effects of The Cohesion Policy on the Sustainable Development of the Development Regions in Romania. Sustainability, 10(7), 1-21.

Polèse, M. and Stren, R.E. (2000): The Social Sustainability of Cities: Diversity and the Management of Change (pp.15-16.): London: Buffalo.

Popa, M. (2008): Statistics for psychology. Theory and applications SPSS II edition revised and added (pp. 225-240). Bucure?ti: Polirom.

R?dulescu, M. and Jianu, E. (2013) The Impact of the Foreign Direct Investments on the Economic Growth in Central and Eastern European Countries, Metalurgia International, 8, 200-206.

Rodríguez Martín, J.A., Martín Martín, J.M., Salinas Fernández, J.A., Zermeño Mejía, K.A. and, Añaños Bedriñana, K.G. (2019): A Spatial Analysis of the Achievements, in Terms of Regional Development, Accomplished by the Initial EU-Member Cohesion Fund Beneficiaries Using a Synthetic Indicator, Sustainability, 11, 1-16.

Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G. and Fuller, G. (2018): SDG Index and Dashboards Report (pp.476), New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).

Saczyna, M. (2015): Achieving Environmental Sustainability through Knowledge Management: a Survey Conducted among Corporates in the Czech Republic. Journal of Intercultural Management, 7(3), 133-141.

Savin, N.E. and White, K.J. (1977): The Durbin-Watson Test for Serial Correlation with Extreme Sample Sizes or Many Regressors. Econometrica, 45, 1989-1996.

Tausch, A. (2003): Social Cohesion, Sustainable Development and Turkey's Accession to the European Union: Implications from a Global Model. Turkish Journal of International Relations, 2(1), 1-41.

Uzzell, D.L., Pol, E. and Badenes, D. (2002): Place Identification, Social Cohesion and Environmental Sustainability. Environment and Behavior, 34(1), 26-53.

Walsh, C. (2012): Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 1-4.

Zaharia, M. and Oprea, C. (2011): Elements of automatic analysis and model for using Excel (pp.145-162), Bucharest: University Publishing House.

Zbuchea, A., Pînzaru, F., Busu, M., Stan, S.O. and Bârg?oanu, A. (2019) Sustainable Knowledge Management and Its Impact on the Performances of Biotechnology Organizations, Sustainability, 11, 359.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i57.3837

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.




Copyright (c) 2021 Creative Commons (CC-BY)



e-ISSN:2340-4264   -   ISSN: 1576-0162

Entidad editoraUniversidad de Huelva. Servicio de Publicaciones.

Licencia de usoCreative Commons 4.0