La verificación de autoría en la escritura conjunta de demandas:

Victoria Guillén-Nieto

doi:10.33776/dlesp.v1.7920

Victoria Guillén-Nieto Universidad de Alicante https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0742-1890

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33776/dlesp.v1.7920

Palabras clave:

Lingüística forense, identificación de autor, verificación de autor, estilísticas forense, estilometría forense, análisis estadístico, peritaje lingüístico, demanda

Resumen

This article tackles the task of au- thorship verification in the joint drafting of lawsuits. The article attempts to answer the following questions: What problems hinder the task of authorship verification in the joint drafting of lawsuits? How can one discriminate the individual writing of the subject whose authorship is to be verified? What method al- lows for objective validation of the results? The article is divided into two parts. The first part addresses the problems hindering the task of authorship verification in the joint drafting of lawsuits. The second part proposes an integrated approach and applies it to a real case tried in a Spanish high court of justice.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Altmetrics

Citas

Alcaraz Varó, Enrique , y Hughes, Brian (2002). El español jurídico, Barcelona, Ariel.

Ainsworth, Janet (2022). «Serving science and serving justice: ethical issues faced by forensic linguists in their role as expert witnesses», en Victoria Guillén-Nieto y Dieter Stein (eds.), Language as evidence: doing forensic linguistics, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-53, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_2.

Ainsworth, Janet, y Juola, Patrick (2019). «Who wrote this?: modern forensic authorship analysis as a model for valid forensic science», Washington University Law Review, 96, 5, pp. 1161-1189, https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol96/iss5/10.

Bergsma, Shane; Post, Matt, y Yarowsky, David (2012). «Stylometric analysis of scientific articles», Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human language technologies, pp. 327-337, https://aclanthology.org/N12-1033.pdf.

Brennan, Michael; Afroz, Sadia, y Greenstadt, Rachel (2012). «Adversarial stylometry: circumventing authorship recognition to preserve privacy and anonymity». ACM transactions on information and system security (TISSEC), Section 15, 3, Article 12, 22 pages (en línea), https://doi.org/10.1145/2382448.2382450

Chaski, Carole (1997). «Who wrote it? Steps toward a science of authorship identification», National Institute of Justice Journal, 233, 15-22, https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/jr000233.pdf

— (2001). «Empirical evaluations of language-based author identification techniques», Forensic Linguistics, 8, 1, pp. 1-65, https://pdfs.sema»nticscholar.org/2cee/ce61b8f1ae9077209fe1676e642b097bdd77.pdf.

— (2005). «Who’s at the keyboard? Authorship attribution in digital evidence investigations», International Journal of Digital Evidence, 4, 1, pp. 1-13, http://www.flrchina.com/en/images/001/chaski_spring_05.pdf.

— (2006). «Forensic linguistics, authorship attribution, and admissibility», en Cyril H. Wecht y John T. Rago (eds.), Forensic science and law. Investigative applications in criminal, civil, and family justice, Boca Ratón/Londres/Nueva York, CRC Taylor y Francis, pp. 505-522.

— (2012). «Author identification in the forensic setting», en Peter M. Tiersma y Lawrence M. Solan (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law, Oxford/Nueva York, Oxford University Press, pp. 489-504.

— (2013). «Best practices and admissibility of forensic author identification», Journal of Law and Policy, pp. 333-376, http://www.ncstl.org/picture/Chaski_2013_BestPracticesAuthorship_BLS_JournalLawPolicy.pdf.

Coulthard, Malcolm (2005). «Algunas aplicaciones forenses de la lingüística descriptiva», en M. Teresa Turrell (ed.), Lingüística forense, lengua y derecho. Conceptos, métodos y aplicaciones, Barcelona, Institut Universitari de Lingüística Aplicada, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (col. Sèrie Monografies, n.º 8), pp. 249-274, https://doi.org/10.1400/157753.

— y Johnson, Alison (eds.) (2010). The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics, Londres/Nueva York, Routledge.

Daelemans, Walter (2013). «Explanation in computational stylometry», International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics. Berlín / Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 451-462, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37256-8_37.

De Jong-Lendle, Gea (2022). «Speaker identification», en Victoria Guillén-Nieto y Dieter Stein (eds.), Language as evidence: doing forensic linguistics, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 257-319, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4-_9.

Demir, Nesibe Merve (2017). «Better features sets for authorship attribution of short messages», Southeast Europe Journal of Soft Computing, 6, 1, pp. 8-12, http://dx.doi.org/10.21533/scjournal.v6i1.128.

Ehrhardt, Sabine (2018). «Authorship attribution analysis», en Monika Rathert y Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), Handbook of communication in the legal sphere, Berlín/Boston, De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 169-200, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514664-010.

Fernández-López, Mercedes (2022). «Expert evidence in civil law systems», en Victoria Guillén-Nietol y Dieter Stein (eds.), Language as evidence: doing forensic linguistics, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 85-104, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4.

Fobbe, Eilika (2022). «Authorship identification», en Victoria Guillén-Nieto y Dieter Stein (eds.), Language as evidence: doing forensic linguistics, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 185-217, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_7.

Gil-Salom, Luz; Soler-Monreal, Carmen; Stuart, Keith; y Candela-Coderch, Jorge (2004). TextWorks, Valencia, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (Departamento de Idiomas).

Grant, Tim (2007). «Quantifying evidence in forensic authorship analysis». International Journal of Speech and the Law, 14, 1, pp. 1-25, https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v14i1.1.

— (2008). Approaching questions in forensic authorship analysis», en John Gibbons y M. Teresa Turell (eds.), Dimensions of forensic linguistics, Ámsterdam/Filadelfia, John Benjamins, pp. 215-229.

Guillén-Nieto, Victoria (2020). «The relevance of context in plagiarism detection: The case of a professional legal genre», Ibérica, 40, pp. 101-122.

— y Stein, Dieter (eds.) (2022). Language as evidence: doing forensic linguistics, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4.

— (2022). «Introduction: theory and practice in forensic linguistics», en Victoria Guillén-Nieto y Dieter Stein (eds.), Language as evidence: doing forensic linguistics, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-33, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_1.

Halvani, Oren; Winter, Christian, y Pflug, Anika (2016). «Authorship verification for different languages, genres and topics», Digital Investigation, 16, pp. 33-43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2016.01.006.

Hammel, Andrew (2022). «Linguistic expert evidence in the common law, en Victoria Guillén-Nieto y Dieter Stein (eds.), Language as evidence: Doing forensic linguistics, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 55-84, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_3.

Holmes, David I. (1998). «The evolution of stylometry in humanities scholarship», Literary and Linguistic Computing, 13, pp. 111-117, https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/13.3.111.

Houvardas John, y Stamatatos, Efstathios (2006). «N-gram feature selection for authorship identification», en Jérôme Euzenat y John Domingue (eds.), Artificial intelligence: Methodology, systems, and applications. AIMSA. Lecture notes in computer science, Berlín/Heidelberg, Springer, 4183, pp. 77-86, https://doi.org/10.1007/11861461_10.

Kaczynski, Theodore (1995). The UNABOMBER Manifesto, https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/national/unabom-manifesto-1.html.

Kniffka, Hannes (2000). «Anonymous authorship analysis without comparison data? A case study with methodological implications», Linguistische Berichte, 182, pp. 179-198.

Kredens, Krzysztof, y Coulthard, Malcolm (2012). «Corpus linguistics and authorship identification», en Peter Tiersma y Lawrence M. Solan (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law, Oxford/Nueva York, Oxford University Press, pp. 504-516.

Ley de Propiedad Intelectual 1/1996 de 12 de abril de 1996. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rdlg/1996/04/12/1.

López-Escobedo, Fernanda; Sierra, Gerardo, y Solórzano, Julián (2019). «SAUTEE: un recurso en línea para análisis estilométricos». LinguaMática, 11, 1, pp. 69-81, https://doi.org/10.21814/lm.11.1.270.

Real Academia Española (2014). Diccionario de la lengua española [en línea], 23.ª edición, versión 23.6. https://dle.rae.es/.

— (2021). Banco de datos (CORPES XXI) v. beta 0.94 [en línea]. Corpus del Español del Siglo XXI (CORPES), http://www.rae.es.

Love, Harold (2002). Attributing Authorship: An Introduction, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Stamatatos, Efstathios; Daelemans, Walter; Verhoeven, Ben, y Potthast, Martin (2014). Overview of the author identification task at PAN 2014, Working Notes for CLEF 2014 Conference, Sheffield, UK, septiembre 15-18, pp. 877-897, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1391/inv-pap3-CR.pdf.

Stamatatos, Efstathios (2009). «A survey of modern authorship attribution methods», Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 6, 3, pp. 538-556, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21001.

Svartvik, Jan (1968). «The Evans statements. A case for forensic linguistics», en Alvar Ellegard (ed.), Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Gothengurg Studies in English, 20, 2 vols., Gotemburgo, Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag, https://www.thetext.co.uk/Evans%20Statements%20Part%201.pdf.

Tiersma, Peter M., y Solan, Lawrence M. (eds.) (2012). The Oxford handbook of language and law, Oxford/Nueva York, Oxford University Press.

Turchie, Terry D. (1996). Affidavit of Assistant Special Agent in Charge. U. S. District of Montana, http://www.courttv.com/archive/casefiles/unabomber/documents/affidavit.html.

van Dijk, Teun A. (2008). «Context theory and the foundation of pragmatics», Studies in Pragmatics, 10, pp. 1-13.

van Halteren, Hans (2022). «Automatic authorship investigation», en Victoria Guillén-Nieto y Dieter Stein (eds.), Language as evidence: doing Forensic Linguistics, 219-255, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 219-255, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_8.

Zaṥko-Zieliṅska, Monika (2022). «The linguistic analysis of suicide notes», en Victoria Guillén-Nieto y Dieter Stein (eds.), Language as evidence: doing forensic linguistics, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 373-417, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_11.